Role & Evolution of Panchayti Raj in the Indian Rural System


Author: Sandeep Singh Rawat

ISSN: 2582-3655


After the Central and State governments, Panchayati Raj Institutions make up the third tier of the decentralised Indian governance structure. As the third level of the decentralised governance, Panchayati raj is one of the most striking social and political shifts after independence. However, Panchayat bodies today face a number of challenging issues. There is a dearth of effective transfers of resources, responsibilities, and officials between Panchayati Raj Institutions and Panchayat Raj throughout the States. PRIs are changing, the Panchayati Raj system is exemplified in stories from India, Perspective on rural development, Panchayat raj institution evolution, and rural development rural improvement development of rural areas before independence, efforts made for rural development after independence, the part played by Panchayati Raj institutions in planning for rural development Strategies, Develop Rural Areas.


Role of Panchayati Raj, Panchayati Raj Institutions, Rural Development , Panchayati Raj


South Asia’s Panchayati Raj system of democracy is mostly used in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal. Real democracy in the Indian subcontinent, the oldest system of local government, depends on Mahatma Gandhi’s ‘gramme of Swaraj’ ideology and ‘power for people’ protests. It is quite difficult for these many Panchayats to increase their influence. As a result, after the 73rd Constitutional Act (amendment)’s 20 years of implementation,[1] the Panchayati Raj Ministerial Assessment was conducted in the framework of the empowerment of the Panchayat, which is outlined in the Act. The same year, Andhra Pradesh State put this idea into action. Panchayati Raj (PRI) institutions were quickly established in several states, but they were unable to maintain the fervour for which they were founded. Nearly all local governments in New Delhi, Union Government INC, had created an Integrated Rural Development Policy (IRDP) by the end of 1960[2]. Global schemes including SMAFDA, Drought Prone Areas (DPAP), and ITDA have been created to address the agricultural problem. National programmes are being implemented in this situation, which is currently experiencing a new agricultural crisis. Local planning has become less and less important on the governmental agenda. Instead, government agencies around the world have put in place job and poverty eradication schemes. The organisations of Panchayati Raj are not participating in development activities and lack funding from local government due to a developing propensity towards centralization in state and federal administrations. Politicians in the state lacked the political clout to deny these organisations funding and authority. Additionally, the Panchayati Raj system’s inadequacy in the first century was a result of the ongoing postponing of these organisations’ elections. In order to investigate the viability of consolidating Panchayati Raj in 1978, the Janata Government established the Ahsoka Mehta Committee in 1977.[3]

The central government and the governments make up the first two strata of the Indian government, leaving the Panchayati Raj institutions as the third. The third stage of respectable governance since Independence is Panchayati raj, one of the most remarkable social and political changes. But Panchayati’s organisations are currently dealing with some serious problems. There are no real financial transactions, obligations, or employees in any State’s Panchayati raj institutions. The emergence of leadership from underrepresented groups like the Dalits, women, and tribes is further hampered by social difficulties. Additionally, it is unclear what the three Panchayat system bodies’ roles are. The anticipated social and political transformations after the establishment of the Panchayati Raj system are well underway.[4] More crucially, Panchayati Raj’s primary goals, such as social equality, gender equality, and a shift in the levels of local leadership, are not being achieved.In this regard, it was noted that disadvantaged groups still encounter many obstacles and find it challenging to take part in a grassroots development process, such as women and other backward groups.


As the Nodal Ministry for the majority of rural development and health activities, the Rural Development Ministry is a crucial part of the nation’s overall development strategy. The Indian Ministry of Rural Affairs is developing a multifaceted strategy to end poverty through expanded economic opportunities, a social security system, and improved infrastructural development. This attempts to improve the standard of living for the most marginalised groups of society in rural India.

The Rural Development Ministry has two divisions:

i. Rural Development Department,

ii. Land Resources Department.


All of India’s states started following the trend of severe democratic decentralisation after the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act. When it comes to implementing the Panchayati Raj Institutes, certain States are ahead of others. In several countries, the local bureaucratic elite network’s traditional power structure underwent significant change. The system has helped women, SCs, STs, and other governing groups in some countries as well as other social groups that were previously marginalised.

Kerala, for instance, uses a novel approach to fund the institutions of the Raj Panchayati, a decentralised planning system that involves public participation. Lower municipalities are unaffected by higher ones. In Kerala, the Presidents of Panchayati are extremely clear about their responsibility in delivering, carrying out, and developing Panchayat Plans.

They actively contribute to the effective management of childcare, primary, and medical facilities. The Panchayati Raj Institutions in Kerala have launched programmes for adult literacy, water shield management, and participatory management of natural resources. Women and impoverished groups from all around society contributed significantly to the development process.

However, Kerala is not immune from the grassroots elite seizing political control. Institutions under Panchayati Raj can occasionally suffer from polarisation and engagement by local party leaders, which makes them less unbiased and more partisan.

Another state with active Panchayati Raj institutions is Madhya Pradesh. The 73rd Amendment Act’s District Planning provisions were implemented in order to provide Madhya Pradesh’s districts more control over decision-making. Gramme Panchayati’s functions were also carried out by Gramme Sabha through numerous Gramme Swaraj committees. The Madhya Pradesh Panchayati Raj model takes the shape of a neighbourhood council run by Gramme Sabah members.[5]


In India, the government, not private citizens, provided the majority of the support for the development of rural areas. For the planning and implementation of rural development efforts, an appropriate institutional framework is required. To meet this need, the Panchayat Raj Institution (PRIs) was established in India. Additionally, the PRIs give local self-governing organisations the opportunity to take part in the design and implementation of rural development activities. Thus, the PRIs support rural development in India. Since gaining our independence, our national social, economic, and planning policies have been more heavily focused on creating adequate rural, economic, and social infrastructures and on promoting overall development. Our county’s planning strategies have given agriculture and rural development first priority.The suggested efforts had a substantial impact on rural economy development in the first five-year plan. The first five years plan indicates that “the growth of agriculture is based on rural labour and the full utilization of local resources.”

According to the Committee on Projects Report from 1957, until the development or establishment of a democratic, representative organisation that serves local interests, monitors local spending, and provides assistance, local spending cannot be guaranteed. For a long period, Panchayati was around. The current organisation is significantly different from the past in terms of authority, purpose, and financial resources. The current regime is primarily composed of four elements: (I) democracy’s universal development and the Panchayat. (ii) the placement of new state powers on these bodies (iii) the growth, transition to the panchayat, and (iv) the improvement of the bodies’ resources, as well as agriculture, tasks given to it, health, welfare, and education.

Construction of or improvements to existing social infrastructure, such as markets, schools, hospitals, roads, and communications, are a major component of rural development. Multi-sectoral operations are a well-known feature of rural development. The main goal of rural development is to raise the standard of living for rural residents, especially in the weaker and poorer areas. To encourage democratic decentralisation, the Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs) provided a chance for local initiative and participation in development activities.


The idea of development encompasses every facet of a human life. Creating and implementing government policy for society is ultimately a public activity. On the other hand, for people to live peacefully, rural development is necessary in the social, economic, political, and cultural arenas. It is a broad, all-encompassing word that takes into account the political and socioeconomic development of rural areas. Initiatives to improve rural infrastructure, family income and education, health and security systems, and education are among the things it entails, in addition to attempts to strengthen the democratic frameworks of Panchayati Raj organisations. Initiatives for rural development, including those for food, shelter, or clothes, aim to provide fundamental necessities while reducing poverty and unemployment.The Mahatma Gandhi National Employment Guarantee, the Indira Awas Yojana, the Pradhan Mantri Grail Sadak Yojana, the Integrated Child Departments (ICDS, Dwcra), and other development initiatives have all been launched by the Indian government. A number of development efforts have been carried out by the Indian government. India has developed a variety of development schemes with that objective in mind. The Incorporated Child Statement, for example The distance between urban and rural areas is decreased in order to correct imbalances and accelerate growth.

 Rural development is a very important and well-known concept in developed and industrialised countries all over the world. However, the idea of rural development is not widely accepted and is applied in a variety of ways depending on the situation. This refers to the comprehensive development of rural areas with the intention of raising the standard of living for rural residents. a broad, all-encompassing concept of agricultural operations, including allied activities such as urban, rural, and cottage industries, socioeconomic infrastructure, and human resources in particular. As a result, multiple institutional, physical, technical, economic, social, and cultural aspects interact with one another. It is meant to enhance the economic and social well being of a rural, underprivileged people. A multidisciplinary approach combining agricultural, social, behavioural, engineering, and management


India’s prior autonomous democratic institutions were called panchayats. The ancient Indian scripture “Rig-Veda,[6]” which is composed of Sabha and Samities, gives a description of the Panchayat. The Panchayat is literally a gathering of five (Panch) learned elders who have been selected and accepted by the town’s residents. The history and culture of rural India are deeply ingrained in the Panchayat Raj philosophy. This idea is not at all novel. The community received Panchayat Raj under an autonomous structure. Panchayat Raj institutions is an independent grassroots organisation. In rural India, a strategy for socioeconomic reform was announced. The active involvement and participation of their people would be the foundation of the effective and fulfilling job of both the male and female.


Rural design is an approach that methodically and profitably improves the physical well-being of people in a nation or region. Both social and economic sides of this transition are favourable. Development consequently requires both economic growth and a fair distribution of the benefits that come with it. In other words, progress with justice is development. Additionally, social and material welfare, fair income distribution, and opportunity distribution are all aspects of development. The quality of life for those who are afflicted by poverty, illiteracy, and ill health is improving. Development is the process of reducing and continuously overcoming economic inequalities and capacities to increase living standards overall. The development process involves the recipients themselves mobilising their local funds to progress in the aid and support of external agencies as needed by the intended recipients, thereby reducing the role of their affiliated agencies. Economic growth is emphasised in the Western view of development. According to him, this results in growth. Tradition dictates that economic development must have a sufficient per capita growth rate and that, as a result, everyone’s living conditions must increase in line with economic development. Sustainable development is a term used to describe socioeconomic well-being.The Gandhian philosophy, on the other hand, advocates giving the local community more power.


It is possible to trace the origins of the amral modem endeavour to centuries ago in India. A knowledgeable British agricultural officer claims that the 14th century is when the concept of agricultural progress first emerged. Indian monarchs throughout the ancient and mediaeval eras participated in an irrigation system to boost productivity. The State was run by the construction of transit infrastructure by the 14th century to support growing markets and industries. However, as Moreland noted, political and social conditions in the pre-British period were not favourable for contemporary development aspirations, since political and military barriers prevented investment in the agricultural, industrial, and financial sectors, while looting and plunder fueled destructive armies. Rural development was given considerable impetus during the UK Colonial administration even though its agenda was primarily driven by concerns for law and order, the stability of the State, the government’s consent, and the provision of cheap raw resources and cash crops to British industries. Rapid rural exploitation in response to colonial economic concerns during the colonial era resulted in the replacement of much of the rural institutional structure and infrastructure during the modernization of the enclave economy and the imposition of new land ownership links. Railways, on the other hand, have mostly contributed to colonialism in India while playing a significant part in industrial progress in Western Europe and the United States. The colonial officials wanted to commercialise agriculture and expand the political and legal system in order to change the farming sector through a new tenure of land. The primary goals of this project were to increase agricultural productivity (as a source of raw materials for the industrialization of the city) and to give patronage to those who would do favours for them in exchange for financial and political advantages.

Rural society was fractured by the commercialization of agriculture and the colonial government’s increased revenue from land sales, which planted the seeds of dualism in agriculture. More working financial sources were required in order to indebt subsistence farmers. Extreme poverty and recurrent famines in places that were improperly dumped and watered have become a hallmark of the British age as a result of the growing preference for income crops over food crops and the demand from a population that is on the rise.

The post-independence administrations work to mitigate the collateral damage to the colonial exploitation-based economy and society, even though this goal is tempered by a commitment to social fairness through planned, state-led prosperity. Numerous nationalist administrations in India attempted to change the unfair agricultural system they had established through land reform during the colonial era, but their efforts were largely defeated by national feudal and semi-feudal forces. Its significance has been increased even more by the necessity to finance plans for industrial expansion, hasten the rise of the agricultural industry, and convert the marketable surplus of large farmers into exports.on the most of South Asian nations, the early role of rural areas was viewed as primarily serving as a source of surpluses for material and financial resources (including human resources) to support the 12 industrialization processes, which were concentrated on a number of cities. However, nationalist politicians in India understood the necessity of eradicating pervasive rural poverty and putting in place comprehensive policies. The first Indian Prime Minister, Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru, said in one of his earliest speeches to the Congress Party, which was in power at the time, shortly after India gained its independence: “While poverty is wide in India, it is essentially rural, primarily due to pressure on land and a lack of alternative income-generating professions. India gradually came under the control of the British, many of its working and living practises were prohibited, and an overpopulated people was thrown to the ground by ongoing fragmentation until many estates had lost their economic viability. In order to absorb both the absorption of people and the generation of money, agriculture must be scientifically developed, and various industries must be built. Planning must result in the employment of every qualified person and the creation of the most jobs possible.


Our policy makers have been very interested in rural development since the 1950s. In 1952, the Community Development Programme (CDP)[7] was launched. It was a large-scale, open restoration initiative for rural areas. The concept was that rural life was organic and that until simultaneous attacks were made against all areas, it could not be improved in any way.

The CDP has failed to produce the desired results in the absence of people’s initiative and involvement. The Balwanth Rai Mehta Committee believed that in order to ensure participation in the implementation of rural development projects, democratic institutions known as Panchayats had to be established at the local level. The country has recently experienced a wide range of legislation and great excitement. “The institutions were destroyed before they really had boomed,” in Jain’s perspective, as a result of a lack of political will and bureaucratic indifference. According to the Ashok Mehta Committee, the institutions only started to stagnate after 1965, having operated efficiently from 1959 to 1964. Actually, there is no disputing Panchayati’s misery after only a brief period of their horrible existence. According to the L.M. Singhvi Committee’s report, although there was a sense of optimism and regeneration, within a few years of the start of the new phase, Panchayat institutions began to decline, stall, and disappear.


The Panchayat Raj institutions have a crucial obligation to serve the needs that have been identified and their desires to advance, including everyone participating in the process, in order to speed up development. The decentralised plan involves multiple levels of planning. The lower, medium, and upper levels (Gramme Panchayat, Panchayat Samiti, and Zilla Parishad) must all start it.

Institutions under the Panchayati Raj are anticipated to be key players in the formulation and implementation of numerous development initiatives. In order to improve the social and economic conditions of its citizens, India has consistently carried out 17 development programmes since gaining its independence.The Community Development Programme (CDP), which was launched in 1952, was one of the most important development efforts. The programme pursued numerous projects, but there was still a participation issue because it does not participate. the scripting, The central government carried out many initiatives to promote rural development in the interim. Target group approach projects, such as SFDA, 1970s job creation programmes, TRDP programmes, etc., and 1980s community and related programmes were all included in the 1970s. After these efforts were unsuccessful, the politicians knowingly switched to the Panchayati Raj system. In the past, a number of committees have also emphasised the significance of the Panchayati Raj system as a means of effectively involving people in the debate held by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act in 1993, and so on. These committees include the Balwantha Rai Mehta Committee in 1957, the Ashok Mehta Committee in 1977, and so on.


Every rural development strategy is based on a different methodology. There are many different ways to develop, as shown by an analysis of many rural development programmes and schemes in India following independence. You’ll discuss the following below: The international approach India was the birthplace of the multifaceted rural development strategy. The CDP, which was established in 1952, strives to completely develop the region’s human and material resources via the cooperation of the populace and active support from the State. This was mostly due to the fact that every area of rural life was closely related to one another since it dealt with the evolving attitudes and behaviours that impede social and economic development. Agriculture, animal husbandry, irrigation, collaboration, local and small industries, health services, education, communications, housekeeping, etc. are all examples of CDP activities. As a result, the entire approach was created to converge on human growth as a whole. After a while, CD projects were perceived to be too broad to have discernible effects, and their limited funding made multi-pronged attacks impossible.


In which study they discussed the Panchayati Raj, a democratic institution primarily operating in South Asia’s India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal. The institutions of Panchayati Raj, which are fundamental to true democracy, are a third tier of India’s decentralised government. They are modelled after Mahatma Gandhi’s ‘Gramme Swaraj’ concept, ‘Power for People,’ and mottages, a historic form of local government in the Netherlands. The third phase of decentralised governance is known as Panchayati raj, and it has been one of the most significant social and political changes since independence. However, because the Nodal Ministry is in charge of the majority of the rural development and health projects, Panchayati organisations now face many challenging challenges. The Ministry of Rural Development is a crucial part of the country’s overall development strategy. The Rural India Ministry is dedicated to a multifaceted strategy to end poverty through improved livelihoods, a system of social protection, and enhanced infrastructure development. In India, the government played a major role in promoting rural development rather than the general populace. To plan and carry out rural development efforts, an appropriate institutional framework is needed. This demand has been met by the Panchayat Raj Institution (PRIs), a holistic idea of development that encompasses all facets of human existence. The creation and execution of governmental policy for the good of society is essentially what it is—a government activity. On the other hand, full rural growth to satisfy people is implied by social, economic, political, and cultural rural development. It denotes complete rural development. A nation or region’s quality of life can be continuously and favourably improved through the rural design. The positive change is based on both economic and social factors, and its roots may be seen in India’s early modernization efforts for agrarian development. An experienced British agriculture official claimed that the idea of agricultural growth was first developed in the 14th century. It has been established that Indian kings in the past and present made investments in irrigation to increase production. By the 14th century, it was actively engaged in the development of markets and industries, with all rural development plans based on a variety of techniques with a primary focus on the building of transport infrastructure.Following India’s independence, a number of plans and techniques for rural development have been examined. Below, you must speak: Below: India has launched a comprehensive rural development strategy. The CDP was established in 1952 with the help of the populace with the intention of enhancing the region’s material and human resources.


1.Mandal, Amal (2003), Women in Panchayati Raj Institutions, Kanishka Publishers, Distributors, New Delhi.

2.Aram, M. and Palanithurai, G., Tamilnadu, in George Mathew, (ed.), (2000), Status of Panchayati Raj in the States and Union Territories of India, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.

2.Report of the Committee on Panchayati Raj Institutions, Government of India New Delhi, 1978.

3.Bandyopadhyay, D, and Mukherjee, Amitava (2004), New Issues in Panchayati Raj, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.

4.Bhatnagar, S. (1976), Rural Local Government in India, Trimuri Publications, New Delhi.

5.Bhatt, K.S. (1973), Panchayati Raj Administration in Maharashtra, Popular Prakashan, Bombay.

6.Sarmah, Bhupen (2006), Rejuvenating Panchayati Raj, Omeo Kumar Das Institute of Social Change and Development, Guwahati and Akansha Publishing House, New Delhi.

7.Rani, Celine, A. (2002), Emerging Pattern of Rural Women Leadership in India, Kalpaz Publications, New Delhi.

8.Darshankar, Arjun, Y. (1979), Leadership in Panchayatiraj: A Study of District of Maharastra, Panchasheel Prakashan, Jaipur.

9.Goel, S.L. and Rajneesh (2003), Shaking, Panchayati Raj in India, Deep and Deep Publications Private Limited, New Delhi.

10.Hooja, B. (1978), Panchayati Raj vs Decentralization of Administrations, Indian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. XXIV, No.3.

12.Gandhi, Indira (1971), Royal Institute of International Relations, London.

13. Lilvack, Jennie, Ahamed (1998), Juraid and Bird, Richard, Washington D.C., World Bank Sector Studies Services.

14. Jeyabal, P., and Dravidamani, K. (1997), Women Panchayat Presidents, Social Welfare Vol. 44, No.1.

15.Joshi, R. P., and Narwani, G.S. (2002), Panchayati Raj in India, Rawat Publications, Jaipur and New Delhi.

16. Khanna, R.L. (1956), Panchayati Raj in India, The English Book Shop, Chandigarh.

17. Kumar, Sushil and Venkataraman, V. (1974), State Panchayati Raj Relations: a study of supervision and Control in Tamilnadu, Asia Publishing House, Bombay.

18. Maheshwari, Shri Ram (1971), Local Government in India, the Macmillan Company of India Limited, Delhi.

19. Malaviya, H.D. (1956), Village Panchayats in all India Congress Committee, New Delhi.

20. Palanithurai, G. (1996), Empowering People: Issues and Solutions, Kanishka Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi.

21. Palanithurai, G., (ed.), (1996), New Panchayati Raj System Status and Prospects, Kanishka Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi.

22.  Palanithurai, G., Dwaraki, B.R., and Narayanasamy, S., (eds.), (1997), Major Issues in New Panchayati Raj System, Kanishka Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi.








Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *